NADIS
disease bulletins are written specifically for farmers, to increase awareness
of prevalent conditions and promote disease prevention and control, in order to
benefit animal health and welfare.
Farmers are advised to discuss their individual farm
circumstances with their veterinary surgeon.
Identifying The Cause Of Mastitis
As shown by the NADIS
data the number of mastitis cases increase as autumn progresses. However, there
are currently too many outbreaks where no cause of the mastitis is diagnosed. It is important to
know what bacteria are causing the majority of infections along with detailed
records of overall incidence, pattern of incidence, recurrence of infection,
symptoms, treatment and cure rate. If a herd has no mastitis problem, records
will take little time to keep or review and if a problem does appear, accurate
historic records are of great use to herd manager and veterinarian in the
choice of appropriate action. As standard, record all clinical cases (cow,
quarter, date, treatment, bacteria if known). One case of mastitis should be
defined as one quarter infected once, a cow with two quarters infected at the
same time counts as two cases and the same quarter
recurring seven or more days after the disappearance of a previous case is a
new case. Records should be reviewed monthly, to identify problem cows and
changes in herd incidence.
Early identification of the problem
Identifying infected
cows and quarters early allows for prompt treatment and reduces further spread.
Foremilk should be examined (it is a legal and contractual requirement) before
other udder preparation at each milking and if in-line filters are used they
need checking after every cow milked. Abnormalities or changes in the udder
should be investigated..
Milk sampling
All mastitis cases
should be sampled before any treatment is given. If the incidence remains low,
the samples can be frozen after collection and can be discarded later, if not
required. However if there is cause for concern or if
information is required for monitoring purposes, the samples can be sent for
analysis. Sending batches of samples, rather than individual samples,
may also have the advantage of reducing analysis cost per sample. At current
prices, a total cost for the year would be around £150 per 100 cows assuming an
incidence of 40 cases/100 cows. In addition to identifying the pathogens
responsible for causing the infection, antibiotic sensitivity can also be
determined from the same samples if needed.
Milk sampling technique
High standards of
milk sampling techniques are required to avoid the wasted costs of ‘dirty’
samples. Everyone milking cows should know how to take ‘clean’ milk samples:
·
Clean
hands (wear clean disposable/disinfected gloves)
·
Wash
and thoroughly dry visibly dirty teats
·
Clean
the teat end with a cotton wool swab soaked in spirit or antiseptic wipes
·
Strip
out 4 to 6 (more is better than less) squirts of milk to flush out the teat
canal
·
Remove
the lid from a sterile sample bottle (get bottles from the vet’, lab’ or dairy
consultant)
·
Hold
the bottle at an angle of approximately 450 to the teat to prevent
dust/debris falling from the udder into the bottle (keep the lid held with the
underside facing down to avoid contamination)
·
Draw
one or two squirts of milk into the bottle, the bottle must not be filled to
the top if it is to be frozen.
·
Replace
the bottle lid immediately, label the bottle with farm, cow and quarter
identity and date and place immediately in the fridge at 40C.
·
The
sample should be at the lab’ within 72 hours (max.) of collection
·
If
longer storage is essential, freeze the samples immediately after collection
·
Freezing
tends to reduce bacterial numbers especially coliforms and must not be used for SCC samples, although results are still useful.
Richard Laven PhD BVetMed MRCVS
Copyright © NADIS 2001
|